Financial Services: Internet

Stella Creasy: To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills 
	(1)  when he plans to publish an evaluation of the use and effect of the lenders compared website on consumer borrowing and debt;
	(2)  when he plans to publish an evaluation of the use and effect of data sharing in the home credit market on consumer borrowing and debt.

Norman Lamb: holding answer 5 July 2012
	The Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, my right hon. Friend the Member for Twickenham (Vince Cable), has no plans to do so. The Competition Commission (CC) is in the process of carrying out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Home Credit remedies including use of the lenderscompared website and the use and effect of data sharing. These remedies were imposed by the CC following their market investigation in 2006. This evaluation is part of the CC's rolling programme of research into past remedies with the aim of ensuring that learning points are captured and fed into the development of CC remedies policy and practice. The Commission expects to publish their evaluation in late summer/early autumn.

Mental Health Services

Chris Ruane: To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills how many applications for research into mindfulness-based therapies were (a) accepted and (b) rejected by the Medical Research Council in each of the last three years.

David Willetts: The Medical Research Council (MRC) is one of the main agencies through which the Government supports biomedical research. The MRC has supported fundamental research on the mechanisms of depression and anxiety disorders; an example of current research in this area is a study at the University of Oxford investigating the integration of drug treatment and cognitive behavioural therapy in patients with anxiety disorder.
	The MRC does not hold a breakdown of the numbers of applications and awards for research relating to mindfulness-based therapies and it would not be possible to undertake the necessary analysis in the time available.
	Research on the effectiveness of new treatments, beyond the proof of concept studies, would be funded through the NIHR Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation programme (EME) and the Health Technology Assessment programme.

Postgraduate Education: Birmingham

Shabana Mahmood: To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills how many people resident in Birmingham, Ladywood constituency enrolled on a postgraduate course in each of the last five years.

David Willetts: Information on the number of postgraduate enrolments at UK higher education institutions from Birmingham, Ladywood constituency is shown in the following table. Information for the 2011/12 academic year will become available from January 2013.
	
		
			 Postgraduate enrolments (1)  from Birmingham, Ladywood constituency (2) . UK higher education institutions, academic years 2006/07 to 2010/11 
			 Academic year Enrolments 
			 2006/07 580 
			 2007/08 620 
			 2008/09 725 
			 2009/10 775 
			 2010/11 740 
			 (1) Enrolments cover students in all years of study. (2) Constituency refers to the students address prior to entry to their course. Notes: 1. Figures are based on a HESA standard registration population and have been rounded up or down to the nearest five, so components may not sum to totals. 2. As at the 2010 United Kingdom general election, on 6 May 2010, the parliamentary constituency boundaries changed. From the 2010/11 academic year these changes are reflected in the table. Source: Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA) Student Record.

Mobile Phones

Dai Havard: To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Olympics, Media and Sport what discussions he has had with the Chancellor of the Exchequer on the potential economic effect of any delay to the timetable for liberalising the 1800 mhz radio spectrum band and the roll-out of 4G/LTE mobile broadband services; and if he will make a statement.

Edward Vaizey: The Secretary of State for Culture, Olympics, Media and Sport, my right hon. Friend the Member for South West Surrey (Mr Hunt), has had no such discussions with the Chancellor of the Exchequer, my right hon. Friend the Member for Tatton (Mr Osborne). Any consideration of the benefits to consumers of the introduction of 4G/LTE services, including liberalisation of 1800 MHz, or the impact of any delay to that introduction would normally fall to Ofcom. The benefits to consumers and the effect of a delay to liberalisation were considered in Ofcom's March consultation on liberalising the 1800 MHz spectrum.

Sports: Facilities

Dan Jarvis: To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Olympics, Media and Sport what steps his Department is taking to ensure local authorities maintain adequate sports facilities in (a) South Yorkshire and (b) England and Wales.

Hugh Robertson: holding answer 5 July 2012
	Sport England is investing £135 million of lottery funding through the ‘Places, People, Play’ programme, the majority of which will be invested in facilities to deliver a tangible sporting legacy for all regions in England. It has also developed a range of support tools, including an online toolkit for national governing bodies, local authorities (LAs) and sports clubs to use the opportunity of community asset transfer to take control of sports facilities on a sustainable basis.
	In January 2012 Sport England published their new Youth Sport Strategy. Two programmes within the strategy will directly impact upon LAs and local sport facilities across England: ‘Access to Schools’ where Sport England aim to work with schools and LAs to ensure school facilities are accessible by the community, and ‘The Improvement Fund’ which LAs will be able to apply to improve key facilities.
	In addition to its core work, Sport England provide bespoke support to individual Las across England on improving the efficiency in the planning and operation of sports facilities. Sport England is working with, and will continue to work with, LAs in the South Yorkshire area.
	As sport is a devolved matter, information for Wales is a matter for the Welsh Assembly Government.

Atos

Tom Greatrex: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence pursuant to the answer of 18 June 2012, Official Report, column 650W, on Atos, what the value was of each contract between his Department and Atos in (a) 2009, (b) 2010, (c) 2011 and (d) 2012.

Andrew Robathan: holding answer 3 July 2012
	The value of contracts between the Ministry of Defence and Atos for the years 2009 to 2012 are shown in following tables. This includes contracts with a start date prior to 2009, but where contract payments were made during the 2009 to 2012 period.
	
		
			 Contract number Contract start date Current contract End date Current total contract value (£000) Payments in 2012 (£000) 
			 FLIS2/0001 1 April 2009 31 March 2012 652 53 
			 ACT/03461 21 April 2009 31 March 2013 6,636 361 
			 CTLBC/10 3 June 2008 31 August 2013 4,143 305 
			 FTS3/CBJPT0005 1 April 2012 31 March 2013 1,098 275 
			 FTS3/HAR/02/09 1 June 2009 31 March 2012 4,019 413 
			 FTS3/FSM/057 19 March 2012 14 September 2012 253 96 
			 CTLBC/1635 21 March 2011 20 June 2011 25 10 
		
	
	
		
			 Contract number Contract start date Current contract end date Current total contract value (£000) Payments in 2011 (£000) 
			 FLIS2/0001 1 April 2009 31 March 2012 652 211 
			 ACT/03461 21 April 2009 31 March 2013 6,636 499 
			 FTS3/001 15 July 2009 30 November 2011 69 Nil 
			 FTS3/LECOM/024 16 December 2010 28 February 2011 290 290 
			 CTLBC/1635 21 March 2011 20 June 2011 25 Nil 
			 CBC/PSA/0446/2 1 April 2008 31 May 2011 571 Nil 
			 CTLBC/10 3 June 2008 31 August 2013 4,143 218 
			 FTS3/HAR/02/09 1 June 2009 31 March 2012 4,019 1,260 
			 ACCOMM1B/5924 6 April 2010 31 December 2010 303 33 
		
	
	
		
			 Contract number Contract start date Current contract end date Current total contract value (£000) Payments in 2010 (£000) 
			 FTS3/LECOM/015 22 March 2010 28 May 2010 59 59 
			 FTS3/ASTD/0004 1 December 2009 1 January 2010 35 28 
			 FLIS2/0001 1 April 2009 31 March 2012 652 174 
			 ACT/03461 21 April 2009 31 March 2013 6,636 657 
			 CTLBC/983 14 September 2009 13 January 2010 204 204 
			 FTS3/001 15 July 2009 30 November 2011 69 7 
			 FTS3/LECOM/024 16 December 2010 28 February 2011 290 Nil 
			 CBC/PSA/0446/2 1 April 2008 31 May 2011 571 Nil 
			 CTLBC/10 3 June 2008 31 August 2013 4,143 124 
			 FTS3/MER024 13 October 2009 1 March 2010 55 55 
			 ACCOMM1B/5924 6 April 2010 31 December 2010 303 270 
			 FTS3/HAR/02/09 1 June 2009 31 March 2012 4,019 1,548 
			 FTS3/ASTD/0008 4 January 2010 31 March 2010 180 181 
			 CBC/2B/0297 9 August 2004 31 October 2008 8,385 1,408 
		
	
	
		
			 Contract number Contract start date Current contract end date Current total contract value (£000) Payments in 2009 (£000) 
			 FTS3/ASTD/0004 1 December 2009 1 January 2010 35 Nil 
			 ATOCIPHER04 1 April 2004 31 May 2009 2,073 112 
			 FLIS2/0001 1 April 2009 31 March 2012 652 215 
			 ACT/03461 21 April 2009 31 March 2013 6,636 146 
			 CTLBC/983 14 September 2009 13 January 2010 204 Nil 
			 FTS3/001 15 July 2009 30 November 2011 69 62 
			 CBC/PSA/0446/2 1 April 2008 31 May 2011 571 497 
			 DCSALA1/1990 23 April 2008 30 March 2009 4 Nil 
			 CTLBC/10 3 June 2008 31 August 2013 4,143 100 
			 FTS3/MER024 13 October 2009 31 March 2010 55 Nil 
			 FTS3/HAR/02/09 1 June 2009 31 March 2012 4,019 798 
			 DCSALA1/1831 25 April 2006 31 March 2009 573 48 
			 CTLBC/866 24 October 2008 31 March 2009 497 Nil 
			 CBC/2B/0297 9 August 2004 31 October 2008 8,385 1,462 
			 RFASC/20479 29 September 2005 17 May 2006 828 139

Apprentices: West Midlands

Karen Lumley: To ask the Secretary of State for Education what proportion of apprentices in the west midlands are (a) 16, (b) 17 and (c) 18 years old.

John Hayes: The following table shows the number and percentage of apprenticeship programme starts in the west midlands region by learners aged 16, 17 and 18 in 2010/11; the latest year for which final year data are available.
	
		
			 Apprenticeship programme starts by age in the west midlands region, 2010/11 
			  Apprenticeship starts Percentage of all age apprenticeship starts 
			 16 3,450 6 
			 17 5,560 10 
			 18 6,680 12 
			 19+ 38,610 71 
			 All age apprenticeships 54,290 100 
			 Notes: 1. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10. Figures may not sum due to rounding. 2. Percentages are calculated based on unrounded figures and are presented to the nearest percentage point. 3. Age is calculated based on age at start of the programme. 4. Figures presented for 16-year-olds include a small number of under 16-year-olds. 5. Geography is based upon the home postcode of the learner. Geographic information is based oh boundaries of regions as of May 2010. Source: Individualised Learner Record 
		
	
	Information on the number of apprenticeship starts by age is published in a quarterly Statistical First Release (SFR). The latest SFR and supplementary tables were published on 29 March 2012:
	http://www.thedataservice.org.uk/statistics/statisticalfirstrelease/sfr_current
	http://www.thedataservice.org.uk/statistics/statisticalfirstrelease/sfr_supplementary_tables/Apprenticeship_sfr_supplementary_tables/

Pay

Gareth Thomas: To ask the Secretary of State for Education how many staff working for his Department, its executive agencies and non-departmental public bodies are employed through off-payroll engagements costing less than £58,200 per annum; and if he will make a statement.

Tim Loughton: The Department for Education recently published figures relating to the number of staff working for the Department, its executive agencies and non-departmental public bodies who are employed through off-payroll engagements costing more than £58,200 per annum. This information was published as part of a cross-Government review of the tax arrangements of public sector appointees. The information supplied for the review was based on data from 31 January 2012. We have therefore used this same date when supplying information relating to engagements worth less than £58.200 per annum.
	On 31 January 2012, the Department, its executive agencies and non-departmental public bodies engaged 148 people through off-payroll engagements costing less than £58,200 per annum.

Public Transport

Tom Watson: To ask the Secretary of State for Education how much his private ministerial office has spent on public transport in the last 12 months for which figures are available.

Tim Loughton: holding answer 28 June 2012
	The Secretary of State for Education, my right hon. Friend the Member for Surrey Heath (Michael Gove), and his Private Office have spent a total of £3,550 on public transport in the last 12 months.
	In comparison, the overall spend on public transport during the 12 months in the previous Administration (June 2009 to May 2010) was £8,376. The following table shows a breakdown of rail and taxi journeys for the three previous 12-month periods.
	
		
			 £ 
			 Period Rail Taxi Total 
			 June 2011 to May 2012 3,528 22 3,550 
			 June 2010 to May 2011 5,268 2,967 8,235 
			 June 2009 to May 2010 8,332 44 8,376

British Overseas Territories

Andrew Rosindell: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs how many flags of British Overseas Territories his Department holds in London.

Henry Bellingham: The Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) has recently purchased a pair of flags for each of the Territories for use on future ceremonial occasions in London. These 32 flags are managed by the Department for Culture Media and Sport who have responsibility for flying flags on ceremonial occasions.
	The FCO also holds approximately 40 smaller Overseas Territory flags in London for indoor use.

Diabetes

Rosie Cooper: To ask the Secretary of State for Health by what means the NHS Commissioning Board monitors the implementation of the diabetes quality standard by local clinical commissioning groups.

Paul Burstow: The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) published quality standards for diabetes in 2011. It is currently for primary care trusts to ensure that NICE quality standards are taken account of when commissioning services..
	We also have a best practice tariff for paediatric diabetes since April 2012, and we are awaiting confirmation of best practice tariffs for diabetic ketoacidosis and hypoglycaemia in adults. If confirmed these best practice tariffs will take effect from April 2013.
	The Health and Social Care Act (2012) makes it clear that the Secretary of State for Health, the right hon. Member for South Cambridgeshire (Mr Lansley), and NHS Commissioning Board, in discharging their duties to improve the quality of health services:
	"must have regard to the quality standards prepared by. NICE".
	The NHS Commissioning Board (NHS CB) will be expected to use NHS Quality Standards to develop the Commissioning Outcomes Framework (COF) and as the basis for producing guidance for commissioners.
	The COF will drive up quality improvement by .allowing clinical commissioning groups to benchmark their progress and by providing clear comparative information on quality and outcomes to patients and the public. The COF will allow the NHS CB to identify the contribution of clinical commissioning groups to achieving the priorities for health improvement in the NHS Outcomes Framework, while also being accountable to patients and local communities.

South London Healthcare NHS Trust

David Evennett: To ask the Secretary of State for Health on how many occasions Ministers from his Department have met representatives of South London Healthcare NHS Trust since May 2010.

Simon Burns: On 1 August 2011, the Secretary of State for Health, my right hon. Friend the Member for South Cambridgeshire (Mr Lansley) visited Princess Royal University Hospital where he had a meeting with the Bexley Clinical Cabinet and other parties, including representatives from South London Healthcare NHS Trust, to discuss progress on the Queen Mary Sidcup campus project, known as the Bexley Health and Well-Being Campus.
	Diary records held by the Department's individual ministerial private offices show that there have been no other occasions where Ministers have met representatives of South London Healthcare NHS Trust since May 2010.

Parliamentary Private Secretaries: Visits Abroad

Chris Bryant: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice on which occasions his parliamentary private secretary has travelled overseas with him or on his behalf since May 2010.

Kenneth Clarke: My Parliamentary Private Secretary, the hon. Member for Wyre and Preston North (Mr Wallace), has accompanied me overseas on one occasion, on a visit to St Petersburg between 14 and 17 May 2012. I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave on 11 June 2012, Official Report, column 360W.
	There was no cost to the Ministry of Justice as my Parliamentary Private Secretary paid his own travel expenses.

Re-offenders

Nick de Bois: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what information his Department holds on the reconviction rates of prisoners released from each prison in England and Wales in the last five years.

Crispin Blunt: Your question has been answered using the Ministry of Justice's published proven re-offending statistics for England and Wales. These statistics, which include a breakdown of re-offending by individual prison, are published on a quarterly basis and the latest bulletin, for the period July 2009 to June 2010, was published on 26 April 2012.
	The tables show the following:
	Table 1; Proven re-offending of adult offenders (aged 18 and over) given sentences of less than 12 months by individual prison, based on first discharge from each prison, 2007 to June 2010.
	Table 2; Proven re-offending of adult offenders given sentences of 12 months or more by individual prison, based on first discharge from each prison, 2007 to June 2010.
	Table 3: Proven re-offending of juvenile offenders, by individual prison, based on first discharge from each prison, 2007 to June 2010.
	Proven re-offending is defined as any offence committed in a one year follow-up period and receiving a court conviction, caution, reprimand or warning in the one year follow-up. Following this one year period, a further six month waiting period is allowed for cases to progress through the courts.
	Please note that the published figures only go back to 2007 and 2009 is the latest full calendar year for which data are available.
	A large part of the variability in the re-offending rates reflects the mix of offenders who are held in different prisons and. therefore, comparisons between prisons should not be made using the raw re-offending rates provided in the tables.
	To account for the variability in the mix of prisoners, a model has been developed to help explain if re-offending rates are affected by the specific prison they are discharged from or if the rate of re-offending reflects the mix of offenders. For example, a group of prisoners with a high number of previous offences is more likely to re-offend than a group with a low number of previous offences.
	Further information on this model can be found in the latest bulletin and the accompanying 'Definitions and Measurement' document.
	For your information, re-offending statistics are available from the Ministry of Justice website at:
	www.justice.gov.uk/statistics/reoffending/proven-re-offending
	
		
			 Table 1: Proven re-offending of adult offenders given sentences of less than 12 months by individual prison, based on first discharge fro m each prison, 2007 to June 2010  (1,2) 
			  2007 2008 2009 12 months ending June 2010 
			  Proportion of offenders who re-offend (%) Number of offenders Proportion of offenders who re-offend (%) Number of offenders Proportion of offenders who re-offend (%) Number of offenders Proportion of offenders who re-offend (%) Number of offenders 
			 Category B         
			 Dovegate — — * 1 60.3 68 61.3 240 
			          
			 Category C         
			 Acklington 62.3 61 66.7 39 * 28 43.8 32 
			 Ashwell 54.8 31 57.7 52 * 18 * 7 
			 Blundeston 71.9 32 * 23 * 16 * 5 
			 Buckley Hall * 28 * 15 * 15 * 16 
			 Bullwood Hall 38.4 73 27.4 113 22.4 125 34.8 115 
			 Bure — — — — — — * 9 
			 Canterbury 40.0 85 30.6 121 24.6 122 29.8 124 
			 Channings Wood 56.1 98 51.2 125 56.3 144 53.5 127 
			 Coldingley * 5 * 1 * 2 * 4 
			 Dartmoor 57.6 59 59.5 131 55.4 92 58.5 82 
			 Edmunds Hill 53.9 382 59.1 325 47.2 214 44.2 156 
			 Erlestoke 63.2 38 63.9 36 62.2 37 56.7 30 
			 Everthorpe 59.2 284 65.0 200 56.1 198 64.2 176 
			 Featherstone * 21 * 4 * 1 * 1 
			 Guys Marsh 63.6 217 58.0 195 60.5 134 59.0 117 
			 Haverigg 59.3 162 63.5 197 51.1 88 45.1 51 
			 Highpoint 61.5 96 59.1 66 56.1 57 55.0 40 
			 Kennet 50.9 55 50.9 59 43.5 69 48.9 45 
			 Lancaster * 29 75.4 69 63.0 81 66.2 74 
			 Lindholme 65.5 261 55.4 222 48.5 130 39.8 113 
			 Littlehey * 19 * 19 * 10 * 29 
			 Maidstone * 3 * 3 * 5 * 4 
			 Moorland Closed 59.8 82 56.7 150 66.7 102 65.2 69 
			 Mount (The) — — * 4 — — * 2 
			 Onley 66.9 290 59.6 314 56.0 252 64.6 189 
			 Ranby 64.0 367 63.9 371 59.8 318 54.1 294 
			 Risley 75.6 78 59.8 87 60.0 60 60.5 43 
			 Shrewsbury 63.3 300 65.3 369 54.5 514 55.4 332 
			 Stafford 39.3 61 55.0 111 48.6 72 42.4 33 
			 Stocken 56.0 75 66.3 98 54.1 98 49.4 83 
			 Usk/Prescoed 38.5 109 41.0 134 33.3 93 32.4 68 
		
	
	
		
			 Wayland 56.4 78 57.7 85 64.1 78 55.3 38 
			 Wealstun 43.7 359 43.5 170 * 26 * 20 
			 Wellingborough 59.4 32 54.7 53 34.9 43 48.8 43 
			 Whatton * 15 * 9 * 4 * 2 
			 Wolds * 9 66.1 56 52.2 46 42.1 38 
			 Wymott 35.0 40 61.5 39 * 26 43.3 30 
			          
			 Female         
			 Askham Grange * 10 14.6 48 10.6 47 * 28 
			 Bronzefield 62.2 481 63.3 616 59.8 572 60.5 539 
			 Downview 41.4 58 50.5 107 48.2 56 39.3 61 
			 Drake Hall 48.1 183 41.5 159 44.8 154 39.4 137 
			 East Sutton Park * 10 * 8 * 20 * 19 
			 Eastwood Park 68.0 512 65.4 489 61.7 475 63.7 438 
			 Foston Hall 65.8 199 64.5 200 62.6 211 66.5 155 
			 Holloway 58.0 567 60.4 601 58.0 576 55.2 529 
			 Low Newton 71.6 225 72.6 292 70.1 241 64.1 220 
			 Morton Hall 17.7 34 25.2 107 22.9 131 24.8 105 
			 New Hall 74.7 391 70.6 449 62.9 313 59.7 263 
			 Send * 8 47.6 42 * 25 * 21 
			 Styal 67.6 416 69.7 534 58.9 494 53.8 461 
			          
			 Male local         
			 Altcourse 64.6 1,044 64.7 1,434 61.7 1,595 60.5 1,391 
			 Bedford 57.6 689 58.3 636 54.0 622 59.6 510 
			 Belmarsh 63.7 479 67.4 423 62.3 514 63.4 486 
			 Birmingham 65.2 1,040 66.6 1,299 61.1 1,267 59.1 1,041 
			 Bristol 70.1 434 70.2 524 68.3 485 65.7 434 
			 Brixton 63.6 626 66.6 635 62.8 728 66.1 661 
			 Bullingdon 64.7 570 62.0 661 59.4 741 57.2 717 
			 Cardiff 67.0 436 68.6 449 65.8 483 66.7 445 
			 Chelmsford 65.9 637 66.1 654 62.7 649 63.8 613 
			 Doncaster 65.7 1,139 64.5 1,061 65.0 1,058 62.0 1,019 
			 Dorchester 70.2 208 73.6 216 65.5 229 69.6 207 
			 Durham 67.8 680 67.7 742 65.7 609 69.5 531 
			 Exeter 66.0 680 72.0 718 65.2 574 69.0 474 
			 Forest Bank 66.9 752 63.3 1,073 62.6 828 59.1 840 
			 Gloucester 72.4 275 75.0 260 68.2 214 64.2 215 
			 High Down 69.3 505 64.7 903 62.6 725 59.8 681 
			 Holme House 69.7 680 66.3 694 65.3 597 65.3 629 
			 Hull 71.7 481 70.2 477 66.5 499 71.5 488 
			 Leeds 71.9 705 70.4 607 64.0 728 63.0 638 
			 Leicester 60.2 389 63.8 320 65.0 303 62.3 257 
			 Lewes 67.2 341 63.2 467 62.5 419 61.3 375 
			 Lincoln 66.7 529 63.1 674 61.9 653 64.0 553 
			 Liverpool 62.0 1,412 61.6 1,751 56.4 1,430 54.5 1,305 
			 Manchester 61.8 806 59.9 838 61.6 698 60.1 562 
			 Norwich 68.2 444 64.5 389 63.3 491 65.8 562 
			 Nottingham 67.5 425 63.7 438 64.1 359 67.0 376 
			 Parc 66.6 556 61.5 649 61.7 790 61.4 735 
			 Pentonville 66.2 707 63.6 816 64.0 892 62.6 886 
			 Peterborough 61.3 963 62.6 1,020 58.7 936 57.0 939 
			 Preston 67.0 400 68.7 479 66.4 515 66.3 495 
			 Swansea 63.6 313 62.2 328 64.0 300 63.9 299 
			 Wandsworth 63.0 622 65.3 812 64.7 675 62.5 717 
		
	
	
		
			 Winchester 63.8 378 62.2 437 63.1 488 64.8 418 
			 Woodhill 61.3 563 62.4 633 60.9 652 59.5 598 
			 Wormwood Scrubs 56.4 826 60.2 1,088 59.0 1,165 58.7 1,057 
			          
			 Male open and semi-open         
			 Ford 41.8 395 34.4 387 33.5 442 28.1 388 
			 Grendon/Spring Hill 28.1 160 36.3 193 30.6 157 30.0 120 
			 Hollesley Bay 36.3 262 47.4 344 33.7 306 34.2 222 
			 Kirkham 37.9 536 33.4 416 27.0 204 23.8 105 
			 Kirklevington Grange * 1 * 4 * 3 * 6 
			 Latchmere House — — * 1 — — — — 
			 Leyhill 40.7 393 34.4 427 21.4 290 22.7 203 
			 Moorland Open 41.4 140 31.1 148 36.7 128 35.2 71 
			 North Sea Camp 40.1 421 35.7 415 31.3 348 29.6 291 
			 Sudbury 42.9 140 32.3 192 26.4 110 22.5 49 
			          
			 Male YOI         
			 Ashfield 66.2 68 78.1 32 65.0 40 69.4 36 
			 Aylesbury * 4 — — — — * 1 
			 Brinsford 75.8 153 77.4 261 66.4 223 63.6 217 
			 Castington 79.4 165 87.9 132 77.7 139 79.3 116 
			 Cookham Wood 47.9 48 * 4 * 3 * 8 
			 Deerbolt 69.5 259 71.1 291 65.7 216 63.7 179 
			 Feltham 70.4 115 70.1 154 63.9 180 65.8 146 
			 Glen Parva 69.0 551 67.0 587 63.3 536 64.6 506 
			 Hindley 67.2 67 80.5 41 87.1 31 77.1 35 
			 Huntercombe 70.6 68 66.7 51 68.6 35 * 22 
			 Lancaster Farms 80.8 203 78.8 255 79.3 270 75.2 278 
			 Northallerton 72.3 394 71.7 442 66.8 346 66.8 328 
			 Portland 66.3 184 62.0 237 62.1 211 67.5 163 
			 Reading 73.3 191 74.8 151 74.0 150 75.2 145 
			 Rochester 68.6 194 68.3 183 60.4 396 60.4 376 
			 Stoke Heath 70.7 447 66.8 358 70.2 295 67.2 250 
			 Swinfen Hall — — — — * 1 — — 
			 Thorn Cross 58.7 104 48.1 235 40.4 193 34.8 161 
			 Warren Hill * 29 * 19 * 27 * 17 
			 Werrington * 20 * 22 * 22 * 24 
			 Wetherby 78.7 75 87.5 32 * 24 * 29 
			          
			 Male Cluster         
			 Camp Hill 62.5 56 59.4 69 59.2 76 54.9 51 
			 Parkhurst * 6 * 2 * 1 * 1 
			 Isle of Wight — — — — — — * 21 
			 Blakenhurst 66.4 946 71.4 434 — — — — 
			 Brockhill 47.1 102 71.1 38 — — — — 
			 Hewell Grange 30.4 115 34.9 83 — — — — 
			 Hewell — — 61.9 543 57.0 1,095 55.5 1,071 
			 Sheppey Cluster (Elmley) 72.0 425 70.1 428 68.9 373 65.4 347 
			 Sheppey Cluster (Standford Hill) 42.0 467 42.8 549 32.5 486 28.7 377 
			 Sheppey Cluster (Swaleside) — — — — — — * 13 
		
	
	
		
			 Table 2: Proven re-offending of adult offenders given sentences of 12 months or more by individual prison, based on first discharge from each prison, 2007 to June 2010 (1,2) 
			  2007 2008 2009 12 months ending June 2010 
			  Proportion of offenders who re-offend (%) Number of offenders Proportion of offenders who re-offend (%) Number of offenders Proportion of offenders who re-offend (%) Number of offenders Proportion of offenders who re-offend (%) Number of offenders 
			 Category B         
			 Dovegate 42.6 61 30.1 83 37.0 92 44.5 128 
			 Garth 30.2 53 39.3 56 27.5 69 30.6 49 
			 Gartree — — — — — — * 1 
			 Kingston (Portsmouth) — — * 1 — — — — 
			 Lowdham Grange 34.0 47 38.1 42 36.0 50 32.8 58 
			 Rye Hill 34.2 38 18.8 32 20.0 35 24.4 41 
			          
			 Category C         
			 Acklington 35.4 495 39.9 474 37.3 494 37.2 427 
			 Ashwell 30.1 209 36.3 240 34.8 118 32.1 56 
			 Blundeston 39.5 147 45.2 157 31.7 142 34.2 111 
			 Buckley Hall 34.4 154 35.3 201 23.7 198 26.9 171 
			 Bullwood Hall * 28 21.2 33 * 26 * 26 
			 Bure — — — — — — * 24 
			 Canterbury 17.1 35 18.8 48 24.3 37 19.3 57 
			 Channings Wood 35.6 346 37.9 375 32.9 420 32.4 405 
			 Coldingley 34.0 53 28.4 88 38.1 113 40.7 91 
			 Dartmoor 28.5 316 36.8 315 36.2 337 36.2 318 
			 Edmunds Hill 40.6 318 41.5 328 36.3 344 39.6 283 
			 Erlestoke 32.2 174 38.2 178 35.5 183 42.3 187 
			 Everthorpe 41.8 502 45.3 525 40.3 551 43.6 511 
			 Featherstone 31.5 292 30.4 224 28.7 174 33.3 150 
			 Guys Marsh 44.2 299 39.1 294 37.6 306 37.7 316 
			 Haverigg 45.3 322 43.6 401 43.1 325 39.9 253 
			 Highpoint 42.0 350 39.5 410 34.5 444 34.6 376 
			 Kennet * 27 30.7 179 28.0 229 24.6 195 
			 Lancaster 39.5 162 44.9 178 44.2 172 41.3 138 
			 Lindholme 44.8 511 44.2 606 34.8 477 39.1 414 
			 Littlehey 12.6 231 19 258 14.8 216 20.8 207 
			 Maidstone 29.5 112 20.7 111 15.9 107 8.5 106 
			 Moorland Closed 43.2 431 37.4 444 37.2 374 38.4 281 
			 Mount (The) 33.3 87 34.8 115 29.5 105 30.9 110 
			 Onley 44.6 446 45.5 435 45.6 445 42.3 421 
			 Ranby 40.6 609 41.4 614 36.3 634 40.7 514 
			 Risley 35.9 569 32.4 562 32.0 466 35.6 368 
			 Shepton Mallet * 2 — — — — — — 
			 Shrewsbury 41.5 65 53.2 62 42.1 107 36.2 130 
			 Stafford 33.4 350 33.1 459 31.4 494 33.5 418 
			 Stocken 38.8 330 41.8 424 37.0 405 37.8 336 
			 Usk/Prescoed 14.5 241 12.2 245 8.6 222 7.6 223 
			 Verne (The) 20.6 68 14 43 17.8 45 18.2 33 
			 Wayland 30.3 277 38.7 354 33.3 423 34.7 317 
			 Wealstun 24.0 488 35.8 313 41.4 191 40.7 118 
			 Wellingborough 37.7 257 38.1 307 37.6 287 36.0 242 
			 Whatton 3.3 274 8.7 288 9.3 225 10.7 168 
			 Wolds 34.2 155 32.7 156 36.9 195 40.4 208 
			 Wymott 23.7 472 27.6 485 25.4 457 26.5 377 
			          
			 Female         
			 Askham Grange 7.2 97 8.3 109 5.7 122 5.5 127 
			 Bronzefield 25.0 40 37.5 72 30.9 81 27.4 95 
			 Downview 25.6 133 23.5 179 29.1 134 28.9 121 
			 Drake Hall 12.0 192 11 209 13.4 179 16.9 183 
		
	
	
		
			 East Sutton Park 6.9 72 0 53 5.1 59 5.5 55 
			 Eastwood Park 24.2 91 29.9 117 39.5 109 35.6 90 
			 Foston Hall 26.6 94 34.7 75 21.7 83 23.2 69 
			 Holloway 30.5 95 28.6 91 36.6 93 35.9 103 
			 Low Newton 38.3 120 34 153 43.6 133 44.3 113 
			 Morton Hall 8.2 85 9.3 108 12.4 113 15.7 108 
			 New Hall 47.0 132 41.4 145 35.4 144 35.3 139 
			 Send 26.2 65 20.9 110 27.7 94 24.7 85 
			 Styal 32.3 155 25.2 163 25.2 155 29.6 152 
			          
			 Male local         
			 Altcourse 34.7 496 39.4 554 42.9 623 44.5 582 
			 Bedford 41.7 115 50 132 45.5 167 51.4 146 
			 Belmarsh 43.5 115 39.4 104 39.7 136 41.6 149 
			 Birmingham 45.2 473 44 475 37.2 376 39.5 398 
			 Bristol 52.8 106 42.4 118 47.0 132 54.1 146 
			 Brixton 52.2 115 47.1 85 54.7 117 54.0 126 
			 Bullingdon 37.3 279 35.6 292 44.8 339 47.7 300 
			 Cardiff 43.1 195 42.1 183 43.9 269 50.7 274 
			 Chelmsford 46.5 157 46.9 145 44.0 150 46.7 152 
			 Doncaster 44.6 296 40.9 257 42.1 366 45.5 389 
			 Dorchester 52.6 38 38.2 55 34.0 50 43.9 66 
			 Durham 50.5 317 53.3 300 49.6 280 43.5 246 
			 Exeter 49.0 100 53.9 89 43.7 103 51.4 105 
			 Forest Bank 47.6 389 44.1 415 41.6 445 42.7 567 
			 Gloucester 55.7 79 54.1 85 35.5 110 44.1 93 
			 High Down 37.9 169 48.6 212 40.1 257 45.9 246 
			 Holme House 50.0 408 44.7 385 47.3 429 50.0 424 
			 Hull 39.3 280 37.6 277 48.9 307 50.4 252 
			 Leeds 50.2 267 46.2 247 46.5 314 47.1 340 
			 Leicester 47.4 57 50.6 81 50.0 76 46.3 67 
			 Lewes 54.9 133 41.5 188 40.2 194 44.4 171 
			 Lincoln 41.9 191 47.5 242 41.2 291 41.3 298 
			 Liverpool 43.9 524 42.1 627 41.3 656 42.3 650 
			 Manchester 42.0 281 42.2 320 37.2 312 39.9 286 
			 Norwich 37.1 202 38.8 209 39.6 207 41.7 252 
			 Nottingham 49.5 109 54 113 41.3 126 45.5 176 
			 Parc 49.1 574 48.7 598 45.4 625 48.4 663 
			 Pentonville 50.7 142 43.4 173 50.5 192 54.1 220 
			 Peterborough 43.4 348 42 286 36.9 344 38.2 401 
			 Preston 38.5 122 47.1 138 43.8 194 50.3 203 
			 Swansea 40.5 153 40.3 119 39.7 131 50.7 144 
			 Wandsworth 31.8 214 35.1 231 32.0 241 37.6 234 
			 Winchester 32.5 157 37.3 161 37.4 187 30.3 175 
			 Woodhill 51.0 155 43.6 149 46.3 164 49.5 200 
			 Wormwood Scrubs 46.3 242 43.7 252 44.7 465 44.2 423 
			          
			 Male open and semi-open         
			 Blantyre House 3.3 30 3.2 31 * 29 * 24 
			 Ford 12.2 327 13.1 350 13.1 366 13.6 330 
			 Grendon/Spring Hill 8.9 269 11.1 253 12.9 186 8.9 146 
			 Hollesley Bay 13.5 281 21 309 16.8 340 18.0 284 
			 Kirkham 11.8 465 10.9 551 11.2 499 11.6 388 
			 Kirklevington Grange 7.3 137 12.2 164 18.0 111 10.9 101 
		
	
	
		
			 Latchmere House 6.7 105 6.7 119 5.9 118 8.7 103 
			 Leyhill 14.1 276 10.1 328 12.2 354 12.7 323 
			 Moorland Open 13.3 241 17.1 252 15.4 175 18.1 138 
			 North Sea Camp 17.9 201 16.1 292 13.2 287 12.1 264 
			 Sudbury 17.1 422 12.3 424 13.4 434 12.7 355 
			          
			 Male YOI         
			 Ashfield 64.4 45 72.5 40 54.7 53 55.0 60 
			 Aylesbury 33.3 87 27.3 88 29.9 77 40.5 79 
			 Brinsford 67.2 61 53.9 128 36.3 168 45.0 149 
			 Castington 58.0 69 64.6 65 62.7 67 64.2 53 
			 Cookham Wood 29.4 51 * 1 * 14 * 15 
			 Deerbolt 53.5 331 54 387 47.9 340 47.2 301 
			 Feltham 54.1 37 * 25 34.4 32 52.0 50 
			 Glen Parva 52.9 420 46.2 461 48.1 478 48.2 409 
			 Hindley 47.7 149 53.7 136 61.9 42 80.7 31 
			 Huntercombe 49.4 81 51.5 68 56.9 58 58.3 48 
			 Lancaster Farms 56.9 72 56.3 71 53.2 94 52.8 108 
			 Northallerton 55.5 247 58.6 292 53.1 258 49.8 261 
			 Portland 40.9 301 45.9 314 40.6 345 41.6 308 
			 Reading 51.8 56 45.5 66 40.0 40 42.6 54 
			 Rochester 44.0 248 46.7 353 42.0 472 47.5 503 
			 Stoke Heath 47.6 313 51 288 47.1 293 54.0 285 
			 Swinfen Hall 29.4 143 34 144 32.8 116 30.6 98 
			 Thorn Cross 28.8 177 28.6 224 21.7 276 25.1 267 
			 Warren Hill * 29 * 21 70.6 34 * 29 
			 Werrington * 29 * 25 * 22 * 21 
			 Wetherby 62.9 62 54.3 35 65.9 41 58.3 36 
			          
			 Male Cluster         
			 Albany * 22 * 23 * 18 * 19 
			 Camp Hill 38.5 327 39.5 306 33.9 248 31.1 222 
			 Parkhurst 34.4 32 * 14 * 13 * 12 
			 Isle of Wight — — — — — — * 25 
			 Blakenhurst 44.8 239 51.3 80 — — — — 
			 Brockhill 25.5 110 34.9 66 — — — — 
			 Hewell Grange 9.5 148 13.9 65 — — — — 
			 Hewell — — 39.6 288 32.0 606 32.9 578 
			 Sheppey Cluster (Elmley) 36.0 272 41.2 284 39.9 193 45.5 202 
			 Sheppey Cluster (Standford Hill) 11.6 337 15.2 342 14.0 315 16.1 279 
			 Sheppey Cluster (Swaleside) * 6 * 7 * 5 * 18 
			          
			 Dispersal         
			 Frankland 5.7 35 * 19 * 14 * 15 
			 Full Sutton * 27 * 19 * 11 * 9 
			 Long Lartin * 4 * 8 * 5 * 4 
			 Wakefield * 15 * 23 * 26 * 18 
			 Whitemoor * 8 * 2 * 3 * 2 
		
	
	
		
			 Table 3: Juvenile proven re-offending data, by individual prison, based on first discharge from each prison, 2007 to June 2010 
			  2007 2008 2009 12 months ending June 2010 
			  Proportion of offenders who re-offend (%) Number of offenders Proportion of offenders who re-offend (%) Number of offenders Proportion of offenders who re-offend (%) Number of offenders Proportion of offenders who re-offend (%) Number of offenders 
			 Ashfield 77.2 378 76.0 387 72.5 334 69.8 242 
			 Brinsford 72.4 156 71.4 112 61.8 102 64.0 50 
			 Castington 81.9 171 77.6 152 78.3 115 77.3 88 
			 Cookham Wood * 16 79.4 34 75.3 93 75.0 76 
			 Downview * 12 * 18 * 13 * 8 
			 Eastwood Park * 15 * 18 * 13 * 16 
			 Feltham 71.7 46 * 25 58.5 53 67.7 65 
			 Foston Hall * 19 * 22 * 8 * 10 
			 Hindley 78.7 164 73.7 213 72.6 252 75.1 273 
			 Huntercombe 75.1 449 68.1 451 66.0 350 69.1 217 
			 Lancaster Farms 77.3 282 81.1 264 90.0 30 * 1 
			 New Hall 66.7 30 * 23 * 18 * 15 
			 Parc 95.2 62 78.8 52 85.9 71 78.8 66 
			 Stoke Heath 79.2 207 79.3 208 67.0 97 74.6 67 
			 Thorn Cross 56.3 64 * 9 - - - - 
			 Warren Hill 78.8 222 74.8 246 69.6 181 68.2 151 
			 Werrington 69.9 259 73.7 224 75.1 185 68.6 159 
			 Wetherby 81.6 365 77.3 384 70.9 337 65.9 293 
			 Woodhill * 1 — — * 1 — — 
			 (1) The classification of prisons presented here follows that used in the 'National Offender Management Service Annual Report: Management Information Addendum 2009/10' (2) For details on the prison estate, please see the 'Offender Management Statistics Quarterly Bulletin' at: www.justice.gov.uk/publications/statistics-and-data/prisons-and-probation/oms-quarterly.htm Notes: Italics means less than 30 offenders - treat data with caution * Data based on less than 30 offenders are removed as they make data unreliable for interpretation

Reparation by Offenders

Robert Buckland: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what proportion of the responses to question 19 of his Department's consultation on Getting it right for victims and witnesses supported greater enforcement of national standards for restorative practice.

Crispin Blunt: As made clear in the Government response to the consultation, the majority of respondents considered that the most important factors in safeguarding victims was quality training, risk assessment, following best practice (particularly Restorative Justice Council: Best Practice Guidance for Restorative Practice 2011) and ensuring that all parties consented and were adequately prepared.

Ulster Bank

Vernon Coaker: To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what discussions he has had with the Chancellor of the Exchequer and the Northern Ireland Executive on the consequences of the recent computer problems at Ulster Bank; and whether he plans to support individuals, families and businesses affected by those problems.

Owen Paterson: As I said to the hon. Member in the reply I gave him on 5 July 2012, Official Report, column 736W, Ulster Bank have confirmed that they will treat their customers properly and fairly and that they will be compensated fully for financial loss.
	It is very important that they fully make good on their assurances. I deeply regret the fact that individuals, families and businesses have been directly affected by the recent problems. The provision of financial or other forms of practical support are matters that, under the devolution arrangements, would lie primarily within the responsibility of Northern Ireland Executive Ministers.
	The Minister of State, Northern Ireland Office, my right hon. Friend the Member for East Devon (Mr Swire), spoke again yesterday to the chairman of RBS on the progress the bank has made to resolve the outstanding issues, and we will maintain close contact with them. The Minister of State has also discussed the issue with the Northern Ireland Minister of Finance, while I have also raised it with the Chancellor of the Exchequer and the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, the right hon. Member for Twickenham (Vince Cable).

Welfare Reform

Margaret Ritchie: To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what discussions he has had with the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions on the effects of the implementation of welfare reform in Northern Ireland; and if he will make a statement.

Owen Paterson: I have regular discussions on these matters with the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, my right hon. Friend the Member for Chingford and Woodford Green (Mr Duncan Smith), and the Northern Ireland Minister for Social Development. Welfare reform will provide greater fairness for taxpayers, end dependency on benefits and protect the vulnerable while ensuring that work always pays. It is, however, important that the Welfare Reform Bill that is to be introduced into the Assembly is tailored, where appropriate, to the circumstances of Northern Ireland.

Olympic Games 2012

Chris Ruane: To ask the Secretary of State for Wales pursuant to the answer to the hon. Member for Pontypridd of 3 July 2012, Official Report, column 531W on Olympic Games 2012, when her programme of attendance at the London 2012 Olympics will be finalised.

Cheryl Gillan: Shortly.

Atos Healthcare

Sheila Gilmore: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions pursuant to the answer to the hon. Member for Brighton Pavillion of 2 July 2012, Official Report, column 426W, on Atos, on how many occasions his officials have imposed financial remedies on Atos Healthcare due to a service level failure; and what the total cost of these financial remedies to Atos Healthcare has been.

Chris Grayling: The imposition of financial remedies due to a service level failure is a matter between the Department of Work and Pensions and its supplier Atos Healthcare.
	Financial remedies may or may not be imposed depending on the reason for failure however this is Commercial in Confidence between the DWP and its supplier as is the total cost of the financial remedies levied.

Work Capability Assessment: Scotland

Sheila Gilmore: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions pursuant to the answer to the hon. Member for Rutherglen and Hamilton West of 2 July 2012, Official Report, column 436W, on work capability assessment, how many mystery shopper visits were undertaken at each Atos Medical Assessment Centre in Scotland.

Chris Grayling: There has been one mystery shopper visit conducted at each of the 29 Assessment Centres in Scotland during the contract year September 2010 to August 2011.
	In the current contract year a mystery shopper visit has been conducted at 15 of the Scottish Assessment Centres. Visits will be conducted at the remaining sites before the end of August 2012.